Strengthening of Non-Prismatic Concrete Bridge Piers Using Carbon, Glass, and Aramid FRP Under Lateral Loading
Abstract
Bridges are vital lifelines, and their seismic performance is critical. Many existing Reinforced Concrete (RC) bridges, especially those with non-prismatic columns, suffer from insufficient lateral strength and ductility due to outdated design codes or environmental degradation. This study investigates the effectiveness of three types of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) — Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP), Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP), and Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer (AFRP) — in strengthening non-prismatic RC bridge piers under lateral loading. Using the nonlinear finite element method in ABAQUS (pushover analysis), four models were analyzed: Unstrengthened, and strengthened with CFRP, AFRP, and GFRP. Results show that CFRP wrapping provided the highest increase in ultimate strength (67%), energy dissipation (65%), and stiffness (34%), albeit with a 21% reduction in ductility. AFRP and GFRP also showed significant improvements. The study confirms that FRP wrapping is a highly effective retrofitting technique for non-prismatic bridge piers, with CFRP being the most efficient.
Keywords:
Non-prismatic bridge pier, Fiber reinforced polymer, Carbon fiber reinforced polymer, Glass fiber reinforced polymer, Aramid fiber reinforced polymer, Lateral loading, Seismic retrofit, Pushover analysisReferences
- [1] Zhao, R., Zheng, K., Wei, X., Jia, H., Li, X., Zhang, Q., … & Yu, C. (2022). State-of-the-art and annual progress of bridge engineering in 2021. Advances in bridge engineering, 3(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-022-00070-1
- [2] Ahmad, M. W., Rizwan, M., & Tahir, M. F. (2025). Retrofitting of seismically deficient RC bridge pier using HSP concrete jacket and FRP rebars. Engineering science and technology, an international journal, 70, 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102146
- [3] Afsar Dizaj, E., Salami, M. R., & Kashani, M. M. (2022). Nonlinear dynamic behaviour and seismic fragility analysis of irregular multi-span RC bridges. Structures, 44, 1730–1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.112
- [4] Miano, A., Iacovazzo, P., Mele, A., Di Ludovico, M., & Prota, A. (2024). Seismic fragility of circular piers in simply supported RC bridges: A proposal for capacity assessment. Engineering structures, 302, 117426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117426
- [5] Hu, W., Li, Y., & Yuan, H. (2020). Review of experimental studies on application of FRP for strengthening of bridge structures. Advances in materials science and engineering, 2020(1), 8682163. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8682163
- [6] Wang, Q., Zhu, H., Zhang, B., Tong, Y., Teng, F., & Su, W. (2020). Anchorage systems for reinforced concrete structures strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer composites: State-of-the-art review. Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, 39(9–10), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684420905010
- [7] Megahed, F. A., Seleem, M. H., Badawy, A. A. M., & Sharaky, I. A. (2023). The flexural response of RC beams strengthened by EB/NSM techniques using FRP and metal materials: A state-of-the-art review. Innovative infrastructure solutions, 8(11), 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01245-z
- [8] Jahami, A., & Issa, C. A. (2024). An updated review on the effect of CFRP on flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams. International journal of concrete structures and materials, 18(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-023-00651-y
- [9] To, Q. B., Lee, K., Cuong, N. H., & Shin, J. (2024). Development of machine learning based seismic retrofit scheme for AFRP retrofitted RC column. Structures, 69, 107279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107279
- [10] Ye, H., Zhou, H., Peng, H., Ye, J., & Bu, Z. (2025). Experimental study on improving the strength and ductility of prefabricated concrete bridge piers using GFRP tube confinement. Buildings, 15(17), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15172981
- [11] Hammad, M., Bahrami, A., Khokhar, S. A., & Khushnood, R. A. (2024). A state-of-the-art review on structural strengthening techniques with FRPs: Effectiveness, shortcomings, and future research directions. Materials, 17(6), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061408