Seismic Rehabilitation of Infilled Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames Using Rocking Wall Systems
Abstract
This study investigates the seismic rehabilitation of existing reinforced concrete (RC) moment frames with masonry infill walls using a rocking wall system. A 5-story RC building originally designed according to older Iranian seismic codes (Standard 2800, 3rd edition) was selected as a case study. The structure was analyzed in two configurations: 1) original frame with infill walls (without retrofit), and 2) frame retrofitted with a post-tensioned rocking wall system. Nonlinear static pushover analyses were performed using SAP2000, with verification in OpenSees. Results show that the rocking wall system significantly improves seismic performance. Roof displacement decreased by approximately 66% (from 10.8 cm to 3.6 cm), inter-story drift ratios reduced by 65–78% to within allowable limits (≤0.0055), and plastic hinge formation was controlled within acceptable levels (IO and LS). The rocking wall effectively dissipated seismic energy while protecting primary structural elements. However, residual deformations and construction complexity remain challenges. The rocking wall system is confirmed as an effective rehabilitation technique for infilled RC frames in high-seismic regions.
Keywords:
Seismic rehabilitation, Rocking wall, infill wall, RC moment frame, Pushover analysis, SAP2000, OpenSeesReferences
- [1] Qu, Z., Wada, A., Motoyui, S., Sakata, H., & Kishiki, S. (2012). Pin supported walls for enhancing the seismic behavior of building structures. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 41(14). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2175
- [2] Zhang, S., Lian, Z., Zhang, H., Tan, P., Xiong, Y., & Liu, L. (2026). Seismic mitigation performance and energy dissipation characteristics of high-rise isolated connected structures with TNSAD. Structures, 84, 111081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2026.111081
- [3] Zibaei, H., & Mokari, J. (2014). Evaluation of seismic behavior improvement in RC MRFs retrofitted by controlled rocking wall systems. The structural design of tall and special buildings, 23, 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1101
- [4] Karami Mohammadi, R., Akrami, V., & Nikfar, F. (2013). An improvement to seismic design of substation support structures. Structural engineering & mechanics, 45, 821–835. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.6.821
- [5] Dolsek, M., & Peter, F. (2008). The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame – A deterministic assessment. Engineering structures, 30, 1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001
- [6] Pereira, M. F. R., Pereira, M. F. N., Ferreira, J. E. D., & Lourenço, P. B. (2011). Behavior of masonry infill panels in rc frames subjected to in plane and out of plane loads. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on advances in masonry (AMCM 2011),. Cracow University of Technology, Kraków, Poland. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55808166
- [7] Housner, G. W. (1963). The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 53(2), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0530020403
- [8] Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., Bull, D. K., & Palermo, A. (2008). Dynamic testing of precast, post-tensioned rocking wall systems with alternative dissipating solutions. Bulletin of the new zealand society for earthquake engineering, 41, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.41.2.90-103
- [9] Eatherton, M. R., Hajjar, J. F., Ma, X., Krawinkler, H., & Deierlein, G. G. (2010). Seismic design and behavior of steel frames with controlled rocking. Proceedings of the structures congress 2010. Structures Congress 2010. https://doi.org/10.1061/41130(369)138
- [10] Wu, S., & Yang, T. (2017). Performance evaluation of infilled rocking wall frame structure. The structural design of tall and special buildings, 26, e1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1401