Seismic Design Adequacy of Existing Reinforced Concrete Dual-System Buildings in Rasht, Iran: A Comparative Study of the 3rd and 4th Editions of the Iranian Seismic Code (Standard 2800)

Authors

  • Seyyed Mohammad Ali Hojjati * Department of Civil engineering, Tonekabon, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48314/jcase.v3i2.81

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic design adequacy of residential Reinforced Concrete (RC) buildings with dual systems (moment frame+shear wall) in Rasht, a major metropolis in northern Iran, according to the 4th edition of the Iranian seismic code (Standard 2800). Given Iran’s high seismicity and the occurrence of damaging earthquakes, evaluating existing building stock is critical. A total of 50 existing building plans (1 to 4 stories) were analyzed using Extended Three Dimensional Analysis of Building Systems (ETABS) software under both the 3rd (older) and 4th (newer) editions of Standard 2800. Key parameters compared include base shear, lateral displacement, and internal forces (axial, shear, moment). Results show that the 4th edition imposes stricter seismic demands, leading to an average increase in base shear of 18–35% and up to a 62% increase in displacement demands, depending on irregularity and seismic hazard zone. Approximately 45% of buildings fall into a low-vulnerability category, while 5% require urgent retrofitting or replacement. These findings provide a clear vulnerability map for Rasht and inform urban retrofitting priorities.

Keywords:

Seismic design adequacy, Reinforced concrete dual system, Standard 2800, Rasht, Seismic vulnerability, Pushover

References

  1. [1] Berberian, M., & Walker, R. (2010). The rudbār Mw 7.3 earthquake of 1990 June 20; seismotectonics, coseismic and geomorphic displacements, and historic earthquakes of the western ‘High Alborz’, Iran. Geophysical journal international, 182(3), 1577–1602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04705.x

  2. [2] Talebian, M., Fielding, E. J., Funning, G. J., Ghorashi, M., Jackson, J., Nazari, H., … & Wright, T. J. (2004). The 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake: Rupture of a blind strike slip fault. Geophysical research letters, 31(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02323.x

  3. [3] Edition), S. N. 2800 (4th. (2014). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. Building and housing research center, Tehran, Iran. https://doi.org/civil808.com/sites/default/files/publication/2800 Standard 4th edition.pdf

  4. [4] Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI). (2014). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings, Standard No. 2800 (4th ed.). https://civil808.com/sites/default/files/publication/2800%20Standard%204th%20edition.pdf

  5. [5] Hashemi, M., & Alesheikh, A. A. (2012). Development and implementation of a GIS-based tool for spatial modeling of seismic vulnerability of Tehran. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, 12(12), 3659–3670. https:/doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3659-2012

  6. [6] Karimzadeh, S., Miyajima, M., Hassanzadeh, R., Amiraslanzadeh, R., & Hosseini, M. (2014). A GIS based seismic hazard, building vulnerability and human loss assessment for the earthquake scenario in Tabriz, Iran. Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 66, 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.026

  7. [7] Fatemi, A. A., Tabrizian, Z., Ghodrati Amiri, G., & Razavian Amrei, S. A. (2013). Earthquake vulnerability and seismic risk assessment of Bandar Abbas in south of Iran. Journal of rehabilitation in civil engineering, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2013.1

  8. [8] Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2018). Seismic performance assessment of buildings: Volume 1—methodology (2nd ed., FEMA P-58-1). https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_p-58-1-se_volume1_methodology.pdf

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Hojjati, S. M. A. (2026). Seismic Design Adequacy of Existing Reinforced Concrete Dual-System Buildings in Rasht, Iran: A Comparative Study of the 3rd and 4th Editions of the Iranian Seismic Code (Standard 2800). Journal of Civil Aspects and Structural Engineering, 3(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.48314/jcase.v3i2.81

Similar Articles

11-20 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.