Identifying and Ranking Factors Affecting the Quality of Construction Projects Using the Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy ANP Approaches

Authors

  • Hamed Zare * Department of Building Technology Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Imam Mohammad Baqer University, Sari, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48314/jcase.vi.60

Abstract

This research aims to identify and rank the factors influencing the quality of construction projects .The present study is based on a mixed research method, in which a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods was used. From the perspective of the purpose, it is an applied research because the results of the present study are used to increase the quality of construction projects. In terms of data collection method, the present study is a descriptive survey research and in terms of data analysis method, it was classified as quantitative research. The statistical population of the present study was all experts and activists in the field of construction in Tonekabon city, from which 10 people were selected using the convenience sampling method. Data analysis was performed using the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP. The results of the Fuzzy Delphi analysis showed that 10 criteria including the employer's justification in terms of project quality, the employer's justification in terms of project time, the project manager's activity, the quality of project planning, the constructability of the designs, Monitoring project workshop activities, selecting and monitoring contractors, communication and cooperation between implementation agents, proper financial management, and selecting the best contractor are the most influential factors in improving the quality of construction projects in Tonekabon County. The ranking and importance of each criterion was done using the Fuzzy AHP method, and the results showed that the employer's justification in terms of project time with a weight of (0.122) was in first place, the project manager's activity and the ability to build designs with a weight of (0.108) in second place, the quality of project planning with a weight of (0.108) in third place, Communication and cooperation between implementation factors were ranked fourth with a weight of (0.100), sound financial management with a weight of (0.099) in fifth place, supervision of project workshop activities with a weight of (0.095) in sixth place, selection and supervision of contractors with a weight of (0.095) in seventh place, justification of the employer in terms of project quality with a weight of (0.0818) in eighth place, and selection of the best contractor with a weight of (0.809).

Keywords:

Project quality, Multi-criteria decision making, Construction

References

  1. [1] Wang, K., Ying, Z., Goswami, S. S., Yin, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Investigating the role of artificial intelligence technologies in the construction industry using a Delphi-ANP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM concept under a fuzzy environment. Sustainability, 15(15), 11848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511848

  2. [2] Bryde, D. J., & Robinson, L. (2005). Client versus contractor perspectives on project success criteria. International journal of project management, 23(8), 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.05.003

  3. [3] Belout, A., & Gauvreau, C. (2004). Factors influencing project success: the impact of human resource management. International journal of project management, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00003-6

  4. [4] Yazici, H. J. (2009). The role of project management maturity and organizational culture in perceived performance. Project management journal, 40(3), 14–33. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pmj.20121

  5. [5] White, D., & Fortune, J. (2002). Current practice in project management—An empirical study. International journal of project management, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00029-6

  6. [6] Sweis, G., Sweis, R., Hammad, A. A., & Shboul, A. (2008). Delays in construction projects: The case of Jordan. International journal of project management, 26(6), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.009

  7. [7] Kaming, P. F., Olomolaiye, P. O., Holt, G. D., & Harris, F. C. (1997). Factors influencing construction time and cost overruns on high-rise projects in Indonesia. Construction management & economics, 15(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461997373132

  8. [8] Liu, J., Yi, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Exploring factors influencing construction waste reduction: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of cleaner production, 276, 123185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123185

  9. [9] Kamal, A., Abas, M., Khan, D., & Azfar, R. W. (2022). Risk factors influencing the building projects in Pakistan: from perspective of contractors, clients and consultants. International journal of construction management, 22(6), 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1683693

  10. [10] Rajiv, S., & Harinath, S. (2018). Effectiveness of total quality management in the process of construction. International journal of applied engineering research, 13(7), 85–88.

Published

2025-08-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zare, H. (2025). Identifying and Ranking Factors Affecting the Quality of Construction Projects Using the Fuzzy Delphi and Fuzzy ANP Approaches. Journal of Civil Aspects and Structural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.48314/jcase.vi.60

Similar Articles

11-20 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.